It looks like both parties are working together to destroy the country. Actually there is no other explanation. There was virtually no resistance to Dr Fauci's terrorist attack utilizing the virus he funded the creation of. The poisoning of the entire country with the toxic vaccines is still the official policy of both parties.
Some food-for-thought from a non-lawyer follows for what it is worth.
Standing seems to exist to sue mid- and-lower-level bureaucrats for the covid shot damages resulting from their illegal actions.
• Citizens have been injured as a result of illegal actions (eg, violated Administrative Procedure Act, APA, and others)
• Gov’t bureaucrats, responsible for keeping their agency within the law, failed miserably and they took illegal actions that caused covid shot injury to many citizens
• Is likely that these citizen injuries would be redressed by a favorable decision
Ref-A below summarizes how “travel mask mandate” was taken down in federal court – violation of APA was part of this.
Suggestion is to sue some of the mid- and lower-level officials, that those at the top need to execute their illegal orders. Rationale:
• These people are personally vulnerable, enough so that they usually carry essentially “malpractice” insurance
• Suing them, in light of Administrative Procedure Act (and other) violations, would likely motivate them to pushback on the continuing illegal orders from above, to protect themselves
• Only need to sue a few for the word to spread rapidly throughout the federal bureaucracies, because these lawbreakers would now be at risk personally.
Seems like the three elements needed for standing would be straightforward for things like:
• The bogus EUA’s (where APA was clearly violated)
• The DOD not acting quickly to prevent further covid shot injuries in military personnel, when this was revealed by DMED database (clearly this was gross malpractice by the lower-level officials involved).
Bottomline = The opposition picks on and crushes individuals in order to get their illegal ways, and this usually works because most individuals are not in a position to resist without incurring major damage to their families, careers, etc. This “crush the individual approach” should likely be a part of our strategy as well.
Ref-A = Summary of how travel mask mandate was struck down
Plaintiff = Health Freedom Defense Fund
vs
Defendant = President Joseph R Biden Jr.
Ruling by US District Judge Katheryn Mizelle
• CDC Rule was made without properly following the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
• CDC did not have statutory authority (sanitation and border protections do not apply)
• CDC had no scientific support for mandate (but much scientific support to the contrary existed)
Re “ The reason is that the law requires that the conspiracy or action include the use of, or plan to use force.”
They do have a plan to use force. It’s hidden in the public health statutory and regulatory frameworks and developed alongside the merger of the public health system (HHS/CDC) with the military and law enforcement system (DOD, DOJ, DHS).
Five of the main pillars:
42 USC 264 (2002) - Authorizes HHS to apprehend and detain civilians on communicable disease pretexts for diseases listed on Presidential executive orders; directs HHS to set up regulations and procedures.
42 CFR 70.6 (2017) - Implementing procedures for HHS-directed apprehension and indefinite detention of civilians for communicable diseases on list authorized by president via Executive Order.
Executive Order 13674 (2014) - Authorizes HHS exercise of civilian apprehension and indefinite detention on basis of suspected asymptomatic SARS-like respiratory illness.
10 USC 881 (2012 NDAA) authorizing President to order military arrest and detention of US civilians under global war on terror AUMF.
10 USC 382 (2016 NDAA) authorizing DOD to suspend Posse Comitatus Act at the direction of DOJ in response to biological threats identified by HHS (DHS Biological Incident Annex to the Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plans at p. 70)
Tom, we have had almost exactly the same thing happen here in Canada, but over a couple of decades. Politicians abusing their positions to change our Parliament so that it is impotent and under the complete control of the Prime ministers Office , which NEVER had the power it has now, a few decades ago. Our Commie oriented PM enjoys almost complete tyrannical power (as did his father before him, who ensured this as the plan.). It too was treason and sedition. Now Cabadians must pull up their boots and scream bloody murder at their MPs to force them to take action. Plus we have a number of Charter challenges going to court this year. I pray they are successful. Our criminal PM has been involved in 5 , yes FIVE criminal offences since he took office. 😞
It looks like both parties are working together to destroy the country. Actually there is no other explanation. There was virtually no resistance to Dr Fauci's terrorist attack utilizing the virus he funded the creation of. The poisoning of the entire country with the toxic vaccines is still the official policy of both parties.
Some food-for-thought from a non-lawyer follows for what it is worth.
Standing seems to exist to sue mid- and-lower-level bureaucrats for the covid shot damages resulting from their illegal actions.
• Citizens have been injured as a result of illegal actions (eg, violated Administrative Procedure Act, APA, and others)
• Gov’t bureaucrats, responsible for keeping their agency within the law, failed miserably and they took illegal actions that caused covid shot injury to many citizens
• Is likely that these citizen injuries would be redressed by a favorable decision
Ref-A below summarizes how “travel mask mandate” was taken down in federal court – violation of APA was part of this.
Suggestion is to sue some of the mid- and lower-level officials, that those at the top need to execute their illegal orders. Rationale:
• These people are personally vulnerable, enough so that they usually carry essentially “malpractice” insurance
• Suing them, in light of Administrative Procedure Act (and other) violations, would likely motivate them to pushback on the continuing illegal orders from above, to protect themselves
• Only need to sue a few for the word to spread rapidly throughout the federal bureaucracies, because these lawbreakers would now be at risk personally.
Seems like the three elements needed for standing would be straightforward for things like:
• The bogus EUA’s (where APA was clearly violated)
• The DOD not acting quickly to prevent further covid shot injuries in military personnel, when this was revealed by DMED database (clearly this was gross malpractice by the lower-level officials involved).
Bottomline = The opposition picks on and crushes individuals in order to get their illegal ways, and this usually works because most individuals are not in a position to resist without incurring major damage to their families, careers, etc. This “crush the individual approach” should likely be a part of our strategy as well.
Ref-A = Summary of how travel mask mandate was struck down
Plaintiff = Health Freedom Defense Fund
vs
Defendant = President Joseph R Biden Jr.
Ruling by US District Judge Katheryn Mizelle
• CDC Rule was made without properly following the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
• CDC did not have statutory authority (sanitation and border protections do not apply)
• CDC had no scientific support for mandate (but much scientific support to the contrary existed)
Re “ The reason is that the law requires that the conspiracy or action include the use of, or plan to use force.”
They do have a plan to use force. It’s hidden in the public health statutory and regulatory frameworks and developed alongside the merger of the public health system (HHS/CDC) with the military and law enforcement system (DOD, DOJ, DHS).
Five of the main pillars:
42 USC 264 (2002) - Authorizes HHS to apprehend and detain civilians on communicable disease pretexts for diseases listed on Presidential executive orders; directs HHS to set up regulations and procedures.
42 CFR 70.6 (2017) - Implementing procedures for HHS-directed apprehension and indefinite detention of civilians for communicable diseases on list authorized by president via Executive Order.
Executive Order 13674 (2014) - Authorizes HHS exercise of civilian apprehension and indefinite detention on basis of suspected asymptomatic SARS-like respiratory illness.
10 USC 881 (2012 NDAA) authorizing President to order military arrest and detention of US civilians under global war on terror AUMF.
10 USC 382 (2016 NDAA) authorizing DOD to suspend Posse Comitatus Act at the direction of DOJ in response to biological threats identified by HHS (DHS Biological Incident Annex to the Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plans at p. 70)
Tom, we have had almost exactly the same thing happen here in Canada, but over a couple of decades. Politicians abusing their positions to change our Parliament so that it is impotent and under the complete control of the Prime ministers Office , which NEVER had the power it has now, a few decades ago. Our Commie oriented PM enjoys almost complete tyrannical power (as did his father before him, who ensured this as the plan.). It too was treason and sedition. Now Cabadians must pull up their boots and scream bloody murder at their MPs to force them to take action. Plus we have a number of Charter challenges going to court this year. I pray they are successful. Our criminal PM has been involved in 5 , yes FIVE criminal offences since he took office. 😞
Been wondering when anyone was going to say this out loud. Thank you.
Thank you Mr Renz. What about the lawsuits David E Martin has filed in Canada and USA ?
There has to be prosecution. Period.
Mr Renz,
I am very angry about my Meetup communities.
Meetup in no way should allow vaccine mandates or covid bullshit rules.
Or Meetup has to put liability on the Meetup organizers.
Thanks Tom, for dashing all my hopes of ever seeing these traitors behind bars.
Oh. Wait.
I meant, thanks for explaining everything as to why they're not legally seditious.
*sigh*