15 Comments

I’m thankful someone is pushing for reform on this issue

Back in the spring of 2008 I woke up one morning and wondered who this little known junior Senator from Illinois, Barak Obama was, and why did people think he would be a Presidential candidate?

The more I researched his background, the more alarmed I became and then I ran into the $64,000 question; Regardless of where he was born, since his father was a foreign student in the US for only a few years, was Obama a Natural Born Citizen and therefore even qualified to be President?

The Constitution clearly makes a distinction between Citizen and Natural Born Citizen, but the Supreme Court is too chicken, (or maybe it’s gone too crazy activist) to do it’s job of interpreting the Constitution and make a definitive ruling on just what is a Natural Born Citizen.

Several people tried yo get it into the courts but again and again were told citizens of the United States didn’t have standing.

It’s ridiculous.

And here we are 14 years later and the Executive branch of government is running wild and the Judicial branch is still shirking its duty with that song and dance routine of

🎵🎵 “citizens don’t have standing, ho ho ho”🎵🎵

It’s an wonder there hasn’t been a major earthquake on the East Coast from the Founding Fathers rolling over in their graves.

God bless you ,Sir, for being willing to chop at the root and not just at the branches.

Stay strong

Expand full comment
founding

A Federal Judgeship is not a coronation. These human souls are to the guardians of our Bill of Rights, yet most of the ones that I have experienced do not appreciate this. Instead of protecting the aggrieved citizen, they look and create ways not to hear the case. (Standing). Manufacturing judicial excuses and otherwise failings to protect citizens is not good.

Tyrants thrive in such a protected environment. Ask any small businesses that were shut down as non-essential in the Covid plandemic. The deep state mentality of these judges for the most part was to delay, excuse, obfuscate and prevent the suppression of the tyranny being unconstitutionality imposed upon Citizens. Few attorneys have the guts to stand against tyrant politicians and their governmental powers for fear of being punished. Such weak knees are an embarrassment to the legal profession.

Next these judges are requiring poison shots int the arms of citizen nurses, soldiers, first responders, police, in an effort to destroy America. The damn fools even took the poison shots themselves. So let’s all jump off the cliff together? Ignorant donkeys we are not going to follow you.

Treason to the Bill of Rights should qualify you to impeachment and please explain why treason against the United States does not deserve the death penalty?

Judges that have hatred toward the Bill of Rights must be removed from office.

Expand full comment

Excellent, Tom, thank you. As a retired attorney, these decisions by lawless courts make me crazed with outrage.

Expand full comment

Which of the "three part tests" did the courts use to deny standing to the states over the election suits?

Expand full comment

Agree. It's probably the most serious of the 6-8 unrecognized asynchronous wars we're currently fighting (or ignoring while the propaganda MSM hides them away). Two workarounds are (1) jury nullification (being throttled under our noses). (2) find legal tactics such as Agency. E.g., there's a way to take back (and sue) for ownership of our consumer data using agency law (enables a single Plaintiff [the agent for your data] class action filing, avoids all Rule 23). I also have a project #LOCUS, to return power to SLG (state, local). LOCUS is the location of points and lines that satisfy given requirements.

Expand full comment

Does the concept of 'standing' exist under common law?

Expand full comment

Tom thank you for your hard work and dedication in every single thing you are involved in. You are a true Patriot.

Expand full comment

Below are some non-lawyer views of how:

• The “travel” mask mandate was recently struck down in federal court

• This approach might be used to keep lower-level officials from executing illegal orders

Plaintiff = Health Freedom Defense Fund

vs

Defendant = President Joseph R Biden Jr.

Ruling by US District Judge Katheryn Mizelle

• CDC Rule was made without properly following the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)

• CDC did not have statutory authority (sanitation and border protections do not apply)

• CDC had no scientific support for mandate (but much scientific support to the contrary)

Suggest also suing some of the lower-level officials, that those at the top need to execute their illegal orders. Rationale:

• These people are personally vulnerable, enough so that they usually carry what is essentially “malpractice” insurance

• Suing them, in light of APA violations, would likely motivate them to pushback on potentially illegal orders from above, to protect themselves

• Only need to sue a few for the word to spread rapidly throughout the federal bureaucracies, because these lawbreakers would now be at risk personally.

Seems like the three elements needed for standing would be straightforward for things like:

• The bogus EUA’s (where APA was clearly violated)

• The DOD not acting quickly to prevent further covid shot injuries to military personnel, when this was revealed by DMED database (clearly this was gross malpractice by the lower-level officials involved).

Expand full comment