Sadly, We Were Right... But What Does That Mean?
A few weeks back I published a 190+ page report that included government documents that proved we have been lied to about the danger of COVID, the danger of the jabs, and the efficacy of the jabs. It also included substantial amounts of other information that demonstrated that many of our fears related to releasing an untested gene therapy drug were well-founded. No sane person would feel good about being right, but we now come to the difficult part - the why.
The Pfizer release demonstrates that as early as March of 2021 the DHHS/FDA/CDC knew that these jabs were incredibly dangerous and killing an inordinate amount of people. The FDA document from October 2020 shows they knew there was a high likelihood of incredibly dangerous side effects and that those side effects were intentionally hidden from the public. The question we have to ask ourselves is why would anyone want to push out such a dangerous product if they knew the severe risks. Why would government employees, numerous employees at pharmaceutical companies, military leaders, and possibly civilian politicians push so hard to get something that was clearly more dangerous than the virus into so many people (this is particularly true for children)?
From the beginning the question of motive has been one I have avoided. My short answer has been that the people behind this wanted money and power but there is far more to it than that. Let’s think this through.
When the companies that were developing these jabs decided to create them they knew full well that the use of gene therapy in people has never been done effectively. There were no approved gene therapies on the market and no real need for them in the case of COVID. According to the dozens of doctors I have worked with on a daily basis for the past two years, the treatments for COVID should correspond to the symptoms of the disease plus, perhaps, HCQ or Ivermectin. This would mean that if you are suffering from clots you get blood thinners, if you are seeing lung inflammation you get proper dosages of steroids, etc. This would also mean that very few people would need to die from COVID and our nation would quit printing hundreds of billions of dollars to give to corrupt drug companies for jabs that are killing people.
Rather than taking a common sense approach and treating a disease that we have long sense known has a case fatality rate akin to a bad flu season, people decided to push these dangerous untested jabs. Then, when the data became clear that the jabs were dangerous, instead of pulling them immediately, the same people doubled down, and, worse, decided to use them on children. Money and power do not explain this because the data is indisputable and when you take these actions with intent you no longer enjoy the immunity given to all things COVID under the law.
So what is happening? How can these people believe they would get away with this? I have plenty of whistleblowers feeding me tons of info and it all shows the data started bad and has consistently gotten worse which means one of two things: either the people pushing this feel that they have a mechanism to get out of trouble when the truth comes out, or this entire thing is a means to an ends.
The first of those options is simple and just means that the perpetrators of the greatest assault on humanity in history were arrogant enough to believe that through a combination of corruption in the three branches of the government and manipulation of the public they could get out of this. The second is somewhat more complex and I do not have an answer to this that I can publish.
If the jabs are killing an inordinate amount of people, maiming many others, and is completely ineffective at preventing the spread of the virus (all of which are true), then people smart enough to come up with this plan would have to know there would eventually be consequences for pushing these. That is unless the actual goal is not to get away with this long term, but rather to ensure as many people as possible are jabbed prior to people realizing the truth. If the goal is needles in arms and it was known that people will eventually realize the truth but those that were pushing this did not care that would explain a lot.
I want you (the reader) to understand that I have seen a ton of evidence on this and firmly believe that the answer to the difficult question of “why” will be a combination of the two options. I also believe that when we look back on this time in human history it will be an instance where the truth is harder to believe than fiction. That said, the purpose of this article is not to give an answer (I have evidence but not definitive proof), but rather to ask the reader the question.