Breaking - More Fraud and Cover-UP
Breaking - More Fraud and Cover-UP
DoD is changing more data
We have sent the letter attached below to Senator Johnson that points to further cover-up by the DoD. Thanks to our analyst Mathew Crawford, we have found the numbers for Monthly Surveillance Medical Reports (MSMR) for the years 2016 and 2018 were changed by a massive amount (upward revision of 113.5% of previous numbers) between the 2019 and 2021 report. We cannot find other historical precedent for changes that tally up to millions of ambulatory visits that were only found years later.
In plain terms what this means is that we now have another separate example of cover-up related to the number of COVID jab injuries in the military. We are consistently told to trust the data, but the other side covers any real data and when we show actual data, they call it a glitch.
Below are graphs showing some of the changes. I am assuming the fact checkers will report another glitch without asking any questions of the DoD because it is perfectly normal to accidently miss 2 million ambulatory visits and only find them five years later when it is politically convenient. It seems the DoD is having a lot of glitches these days.
Email to Senator Johnson:
Dear Senator,
Attached is a letter and declaration under penalty of perjury further indicating cover-up by the DoD related to the health and safety of our service personnel. The letter and declaration concern major changes to MSMR reports from the years 2016 and 2018. This may be related the cover-up of the DMED data previously reported.
The underlying issue remains that the DoD, DHHS, and other governmental entities are simply not being transparent about the dangers of the COVID injections with service personnel or the American public. As we continue to watch numbers change the one thing that appears clear is that these injections are far and away the single most dangerous consumer products on the market in any category which leads us to ask two questions:
Why we continue to provide immunity to these manufacturers from most types of lawsuits if the injections are safe and effective? If they are safe and effective, then why would anyone oppose allowing for those injured to be made whole in the courts?
If there is nothing to hide, why are these agencies and companies refusing to answer the critical questions your office is asking? Why the cover-up if there is nothing to hide?
Thank you for your continued work in ensuring the truth gets to the American people.
Thomas Renz
Attached Letter:
